Disputin’ Putin – is he a new Hitler?

By Michael Woodbridge:

The unanimity of our alien controlled mass-media in its enthusiasm to demonise the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, evokes parallels which can only be compared with the media’s treatment of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. Indeed, much of the reportage does just that by suggesting that Putin is some sort of gangster politician who if not stopped will lead the West into a Third World War. In this article we’ll take a brief look at some of the forces attempting goad Western public opinion against Russia as well as the more difficult task of assessing Putin’s value and potential in upsetting the Global Capitalist apple cart.

Taking a few genuinely random examples from newspaper cuttings we find the following…

Writing in the Financial Times whilst rubbing his hands with glee at Putin’s supposed discomfort, Gideon Rachman says, “The emptiness of Russian refrigerators reflects the fact that their economy is in deep trouble. So rather than engage the Putin government where it is relatively strong on the battlefield it makes sense to hit Russia at its weak point: the economy.”

Joining the clamour, Keith Gesson of the American online magazine, Politico, asserts, “Putin has blood on his hands”, whilst Josh Cohen from the pro-Western and pro-Zionist Moscow Times extends the anti-Putin hysteria to include Iran when he writes, “Putin could choose to escalate outside of the Ukraine … don’t underestimate Putin’s willingness to play the Iran card. Meanwhile, Ilan Berman states in the American, National Review, “The Ukraine crisis isn’t just about the Ukraine. It is a reflection of Russia’s expansionist, neo-Imperialist worldview.”

Why, we might ask, do such a random selection of international journalists present such an unremittingly hostile view of Putin’s Russia? What shared interest could Messrs Rachman, Gesson, Cohen and Berman have in common?…Well a clue might be in that none of them are “Old Etonians”.

Another distinctly non “Old Etonian ” is David Aaronovich who in the March 2nd edition of The Times compares Putin to Mussolini. Actually, the comparison isn’t so absurd: both Mussolini and Putin have on occasion enjoyed posing bare chested. However, our David doesn’t intend to be flattering. Commenting on the recent murder of Boris Nemtsov, he describes how after the Italian elections of 1924, which he concedes the Fascists won comfortably, the leader of the then Italian Socialist Party, Geocome Matteotti was kidnapped and murdered. Without presenting any evidence beyond supposition, Aaronovich suggests that just as Mussolini, supposedly orchestrated the murder of Matteotti, so Vladmir Putin orchestrated the murder of Boris Nemtsov.

Of course such speculation makes about as much sense as it would do to blame the Queen should the arch anti-Monarchist, Dennis Skinner, otherwise known as “The Beast of Bolsover”, meet with an unfortunate accident.

Far from being the heroic opposition leader to President Putin as falsely presented by the Western media, Boris Nemtsov was extremely unpopular with the ordinary Russian people. In fact he lost his Duma seat in the 2003 parliamentary elections! Of a distinctly Jewish background, Nemtsov served in Boris Yeltsin’s government of the 1990’s. During Yeltsin’s government to quote Russia Today, “Millions of ordinary Russians overnight lost their jobs, they lost their pensions, and many lost their homes. So, with all due respect to his memory, he was a very marginal figure in Russian politics.” Furthermore, according to the  independent American reporter, Derek Monroe, Putin has everything to lose and nothing to gain from the assassination, “it’s just another occasion to use the propaganda bullet against the current administration in the Kremlin to further escalate any kinds of tension between East and West.”

The most flagrant interference in what might reasonably be considered Russia’s legitimate sphere of influence was the successful campaign by the United States to depose pro-Russian President Yanukovych, after he refused to go ahead with a trade agreement, an agreement which would have bound his Ukraine to the so called “European Union”. Yanukovych had won the Ukrainian Presidential election gaining a decisive albeit narrow lead, with 48.95% of the vote, in 2010, over the glamorous, pro-EU Western puppet, Yulia Tymoshenko. Miss Tymoshenko had previously risen to prominence as one of the leaders of the so called “Orange Revolution”, eventually becoming Ukrainian Prime Minister. Despite her braided blonde hair and superficial, Aryan good looks, she is of a Jewish background; her grandfather was director of a Jewish school. In 2011 Miss Tymoshenko’s sins found her out when she was shown to be guilty on corruption charges and sentenced to seven years in prison.

Despite her grand title of “United States Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs”, Victoria Nuland might have escaped notice, and thereby censure, for her part in conspiring to undermine President Yanukovych had she not made a foul mouthed reference to the EU in a private, though subsequently well publicised, telephone conversation with the American Ambassador to the Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt. Photographs of Victoria Nuland handing out cakes to the anti-Yanukovych rioters in Maidan Square abound. Jewish herself and married to a prominent Jewish, neo-Conservative by the name of Kagan, Victoria Nuland made the astonishing confession that she helped authorise $5 billion in the American campaign to destabilise the Ukraine. Consequently at least 82 people were killed and over 1000 injured in the rioting.

More astonishing still were reports that soldiers from the Israeli Defence Force also participated in the Maidan Square rioting. According to Professor Michel Chossudovsky, writing in Global Research Newsletter, the leader of the “Blue Helmets of Maidan” an ostensibly “neo-Nazi” outfit connected to Pravi Sektor and the Svoboda Party, used the nom de guerre  of “Delta” and was in fact a Jewish army officer, a veteran of numerous operations against the Palestinians in Gaza.

Whilst not obviously Jewish himself, Geoffrey Pyatt is ardently pro-Zionist and one of his first acts after taking office as Ambassador in 2013 was to attend a conference in Kiev on “fighting anti-Semitism”. When asked about the close links between American money and Tyahnybok’s reputedly “neo-Nazi”, Svoboda Party, the Ambassador replied that Tyahnybok had performed a valuable service and he expected him to play a role in the new Ukrainian government. So now we have American Jews and pro-Zionists not only sponsoring “neo-Nazi” street rioting in a successful bid to overthrow a legitimate and fairly elected President, we also have the American Ambassador virtually dictating the shape of the incoming Cabinet.

Enter Petro Poroshenko, media billionaire and owner of a confectionary empire, he is also dubbed the “Ukrainian Willi Wonka” or the “Chocolate King”. Poroshenko had previously allied himself with Yulia Tymoshenko’s Orange Revolution and although aptly described as a chameleon has always managed to sustain the pro-EU and pro-American tendencies within Ukrainian politics. Originally connected to Yanukovych’s Party of the Regions, he was catapulted to power as President of the Ukraine, largely as a nationalist reaction to the Crimean referendum result in which the Crimeans had voted overwhelmingly in favour of a merger with Russia.

Sympathy for Ukrainian nationalist aspirations has led many patriotic and racially loyal Europeans to become blind to the wider power structure of American, Jewish and Globalist hegemony. They take inspiration from images of Black Sun Swastikas on display during the anti-Yanukovych riots in Maidan Square whilst remaining in ignorance of the perfidious Israeli Defence Force which was also pulling strings behind the scenes. In their understandable sympathy for Ukrainian nationalism, patriotic minded Europeans also recall the Holdomor genocide whereby up to twelve million Ukrainians were said to have been deliberately starved to death by Stalin between 1932 and 1933. However, twenty six years since the fall of the Berlin Wall it might be time for Racial-Patriots and Loyalists in the West to understand that many Russian people suffered equally… One of the stock sayings in English Working-Class homes of the twenties and thirties when a child refused to eat dinner was, “Think of those poor starving Russians!”

Surveying the various established parties of what might be described, inaccurately, as of the “European Right” we find a marked division between those that look more favourably on Russia and those which harbour reservations, perhaps not sufficiently appreciating the strategic advantage Putin has brought by challenging the post Second World War dispensation and American domination. On the side of a closer understanding with Russia we have both those with a tendency towards Civic Nationalism such as Geert Wilders’ Dutch Freedom Party, Heinz-Christian Strache’s, Austrian Freedom Party and Marine Le Pen’s National Front; alongside which we have the more principled Ethno-Nationalist parties of the Greek Golden Dawn and the Hungarian Jobbik Party. However, other ideologically principled parties, such as the Italian Forza Nuova and the German National Democrats, remain suspicious of Russia.

All in all the argument that Vladimir Putin is playing a clever but devious game against our mutual enemies is well worth considering. By opposing Global Capitalism he is certainly making a stand where it is most important. He supports President Bashir al-Assad of Syria against all the spiteful lies the ‘Old’ World Order can throw at him. Under Putin the broadcasting network of Russia Today, has for many dissident Westerners, become a lifeline of truth. With the political stance of the duplicitous BBC entirely at the mercy of James Harding and his alien clique this is especially important.

Against such positive considerations Vladimir Putin remains an enigma. Fortunately rumours that his daughter, Yekaterina was planning to race-mix by marrying the son of a South Korean general seem untrue, although it would be interesting to learn what tensions may have lain beneath that story. What cannot be denied however is the close working relationship Putin has formed with Russia’s chief rabbi: Berel Lazar. Rabbi Lazar represents the Chabad Lubavitch sect of Orthodox Jews. Chabad Lubavitch originated in America but has ghettos in various parts of the world, not least in our own Stamford Hill.

It would be a mistake to cast all Jews into the same mold. Orthodox Jews, with their funny hats, curly sideburns and long beards may appear archetypically more Jewish but it is as often as not among their secular brethren that elements  most troublesome to Aryan well-being are to be found. It was just such a creature, by the name of Boris Spiegel, said to be close to Putin, who having wormed his way into the Russian parliament, started applying legal pressure to have anyone who questioned certain Jewish fairy stories thrown into prison for up to five years. Looking like an enormous toad who’d just crawled out from under the pages of Julius Streicher’s Der Sturmer, Spiegel founded an organisation called World Without Nazism. Fortunately he had to resign his seat before any further damage could be done but not before, upon his instigation, statues of Red soldiers had been erected in the Israeli town of Netanya.

In assessing a leading politician or statesman’s worth to White/Aryan interests we could do worse than look at the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. This is not to make a judgement as to whether the book is a forgery or not. Like any other classic, religious or secular, its allegorical meaning is what should be important to us. In Chapter 2 on Economic Wars we find that the following short passage goes to the heart of the mystery as to why Vladimir Putin has been so consistently demonised and lied about by the whole gamut of Western Establishment vituperation. The real clue is that the demonisation only gained a complete hold in the  mass-media after he took the Crimea back into the Russian Motherland at the behest of 95% of the Crimean people…

“It is indispensable for our purposes that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus be brought onto the economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we give in the strength of our predominance…Our international rights, will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves.”

In conclusion to the slightly tongue in cheek sub question at the heading of this article we can probably safely say that Putin is not a new Hitler, although were a new Hitler to emerge Putin might make a passable Mussolini.

By Michael Woodbridge © 2015

# # # #

10 thoughts on “Disputin’ Putin – is he a new Hitler?

  1. Great article. Many points well made that go to show that we may have good reason for optimism regarding Russia and certainly should not get in the way of developments there. Personally I am not a fan of Old Etonians and they haven’t shown they extricate themselves from the Zionist establishment or done anything as worthy of praise as President Putin has done – but that’s just a little matter of trivial relevance here. Looking forward to your next article Michael!

  2. Some of Putin’s actions are very plain to see, he is also forging links and pressing ahead with moves to advance the influence of the BRICS group. Those five nations have massive powers should they ever fully co-operate, more than enough to unseat the US-UK-EU Israel group total dominance, Numbers, land and resources.

    I also believe Putin’s eagerness to sell these Brics nations arms and technology is to stretch Nato forces, especially US forces, to their extreme and put pressure on their national finances trying to maintain total domination.

    https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/what-america-can-learn-from-russias-cheap-but-deadly-t-1540829820.

    Does America remember the lessons learned by the German forces when they took their expensive but superior weapons into Russia I wonder.

  3. Very good piece. In any case, anyone who helps join the dots of Jewish influence around the world must be on the side of truth, such is the propaganda of concealment.

  4. Let’s get this right, Putin is the good guy — right? Ok, he supported a regime that the NWO overthrew and these creeps overthrew him because he didn’t support the NWO. Putin is kosher right? (Pun intended).

    I heard he’s funding the great civic nationalist party the Front National. Maybe he does notice that the Western Europeans are commiting mass suicide while living it up on all their meaningless gadgets, gizmos and junk. He has ”come out” and said this: he’s said that the Western Europeans have massive demographic problems.

    We have…. I’ve got a Turkish friend (a clear Indo-European!) who tells me his Russian girlfriend can’t believe what’s happened to London. Go figure. David Icke (I know he’s nuts) says you can’t work out this planet ’cause it’s a nuthouse. Who can work out a nuthouse.

    Mass movemenst need billions, so it’s time we start preparing to live with a balkanized Europe. Western Spring have the right stratergy; please get involved if you read these words/

  5. I’m not sure he’s a new Hitler or even a Nationalist.
    What I do know is certain people seem intent on stirring up trouble with him, when he is not causing us any…yet.
    There have been at least two mentions in the media that he’s going to invade Poland!
    But he’s also probably one of the cleverest political operators of modern times not counting the hidden ones.

  6. Good article and for us, it’s the fact that Putin is opposing the NWO that is the good part. However, he’s not a Nationalist as he’s signed up Russia to an economic treaty with the surrounding ex-Soviet Asian states allowing significant Asian immigration into Russia. So he’s seen the problems the West has with immigration but he’s copying us FFS!

    1. I think an article/essay he wrote back in KGB school explains it, he wants to recreate his version of the CCCP.
      You are correct in that the ex Republics citizens want to go to the Motherland, mainly for economic reasons, much like our ex colonies want to.
      This is bringing the same problems to Russia we have but Russians are less PC.
      Putin has made strong speeches against foreign interference & zionism.
      I have heard it said that the immigrants do the jobs that Russians don’t want to do!
      That seems strangely familiar…

    2. Putin does not open his arms to immigration – but to expect him to consider it realistic or pragmatic to declare all immigration must stop and to throw out immigrants is to live in a dream world.

      We get a better idea of the attitude to immigration from this piece: Russia, however, is wary of Chinese (or other) migrants pouring into its sparsely populated Far East. Trutnev noted that his plan was designed to prevent the free land from being sold to foreign companies and individuals. Moscow Times called this “an important consideration” as “Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean companies are gradually making inroads” into Russia’s Far East.

      Russia’s Federal Migration Service is especially wary of an influx of Chinese migrants across the Russia-China border. It has warned that Chinese could become the largest ethnic group in Russia’s Far East by the 2020s or 2030s.
      https://thediplomat.com/2015/01/china-eyes-land-giveaway-program-in-russias-far-east/

      If only the White birth rate was such that we could use that land give-away to form a White colony. Putin would not harass us there the way that we would be here.

Comments are closed.